Open navigation

Working paper / 2026

CALLM

Conversational AI LLM Bench

Abstract

We define conversational AI LLMs as the language models at the center of cascaded voice pipelines, between speech recognition and speech synthesis, that return a first token within one second: a median time to first token of 1,000 ms or less. The Conversational AI LLM Bench (CALLM) benchmarks this category. Each model operates every agent of a multi-agent front desk in healthcare, legal, and customer support, with production-length prompts, executable tools, and per-call database state. A simulated caller pursues a locked task over a simulated phone line, so the model receives only what a speech recognizer would have transcribed, errors included. A deterministic verifier scores tool calls, handoffs, and final database state; pass@1 and pass5 measure single-attempt capability and five-attempt reliability.

GitHub repository ↗

Clone the repository, point a model at an industry pack, and reproduce the evaluation environment.

Models

Every LLM on the leaderboard, in rank order. Open one for its per-industry and per-difficulty results.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic

#1

Anthropic's fastest Claude model.

pass^5
62.2%
pass@1
83.2%
TTFT
963ms
Cost/hr
$0.206

Tell-1

Retell AI

#2

Retell AI's own LLM for phone agents, run through Retell's agent playground API with the agent handbooks off.

pass^5
60.6%
pass@1
80.0%
TTFT
352ms
Cost/hr
N/A

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

#3

DeepSeek's open-weights V4.1 Flash, thinking off.

pass^5
57.8%
pass@1
81.1%
TTFT
476ms
Cost/hr
$0.031

Gemma 4 31B

Google

#4

Google's open-weights dense Gemma 4 model, thinking off.

pass^5
46.7%
pass@1
71.5%
TTFT
383ms
Cost/hr
$0.306

PhoneLLM Max Alpha 2 (microthinking)

Pipecat

#5

The large model of Pipecat's second PhoneLLM release, open weights. Runs with microthinking: one short sentence of reasoning before every reply, the mode it was trained for.

pass^5
42.8%
pass@1
67.8%
TTFT
499ms
Cost/hr
$0.222

GPT-4.1

OpenAI

#6

OpenAI's non-reasoning GPT-4.1, the default LLM in many production voice-agent stacks.

pass^5
41.7%
pass@1
71.3%
TTFT
693ms
Cost/hr
$0.894

GPT-4.1 mini

OpenAI

#7

OpenAI's small non-reasoning GPT-4.1 model.

pass^5
40.0%
pass@1
66.8%
TTFT
653ms
Cost/hr
$0.245

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Alibaba

#8

Alibaba's largest open-weights Qwen3.5 model, mixture of experts with 17B active parameters, thinking off.

pass^5
39.4%
pass@1
68.8%
TTFT
395ms
Cost/hr
$0.234

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google

#9

Google's fast Gemini 2.5 model, a common choice for low-latency voice agents.

pass^5
38.9%
pass@1
66.0%
TTFT
610ms
Cost/hr
$0.132

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic

#10

Anthropic's previous Haiku model.

pass^5
36.7%
pass@1
65.0%
TTFT
459ms
Cost/hr
$1.34

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta

#11

Meta's open-weights Llama 4 Maverick, mixture of experts with 17B active parameters (FP8 weights).

pass^5
33.9%
pass@1
61.7%
TTFT
486ms
Cost/hr
$0.484

GPT-4o

OpenAI

#12

OpenAI's GPT-4o, the earlier flagship that many voice-agent stacks were built on.

pass^5
33.3%
pass@1
62.3%
TTFT
660ms
Cost/hr
$1.85

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Google

#13

Google's open-weights mixture-of-experts Gemma 4 model (4B active parameters), thinking off.

pass^5
27.8%
pass@1
56.8%
TTFT
399ms
Cost/hr
$0.058

gpt-oss-120b

OpenAI

#14

OpenAI's larger open-weights model, served by Groq at low reasoning effort.

pass^5
26.1%
pass@1
55.5%
TTFT
340ms
Cost/hr
$0.135

GPT-4o mini

OpenAI

#15

OpenAI's small GPT-4o model.

pass^5
22.8%
pass@1
46.5%
TTFT
748ms
Cost/hr
$0.123

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Alibaba

#16

Alibaba's open-weights Qwen3.5 mixture-of-experts model with 10B active parameters, thinking off.

pass^5
22.2%
pass@1
47.9%
TTFT
284ms
Cost/hr
$0.221

Ministral 3 14B

Mistral AI

#17

Mistral AI's open-weights 14B Ministral 3 instruct model.

pass^5
17.8%
pass@1
48.0%
TTFT
989ms
Cost/hr
$0.244

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Google

#18

Google's smallest and fastest Gemini 2.5 model.

pass^5
17.2%
pass@1
45.8%
TTFT
466ms
Cost/hr
$0.047

Llama 3.3 70B

Meta

#19

Meta's open-weights Llama 3.3 70B instruct model.

pass^5
15.0%
pass@1
27.2%
TTFT
896ms
Cost/hr
$2.02

gpt-oss-20b

OpenAI

#20

OpenAI's smaller open-weights model, served by Groq at low reasoning effort.

pass^5
13.3%
pass@1
34.5%
TTFT
657ms
Cost/hr
$0.073

PhoneLLM Mini Alpha 2

Pipecat

#21

The small model of Pipecat's second PhoneLLM release, open weights.

pass^5
13.3%
pass@1
25.1%
TTFT
224ms
Cost/hr
$0.055

GPT-5 mini

OpenAI

#22

OpenAI's small GPT-5 model, run with minimal reasoning effort as a phone deployment would.

pass^5
12.8%
pass@1
37.1%
TTFT
784ms
Cost/hr
$0.088

Think-Fast

Deepgram

#23

Deepgram's Think-Fast, an LLM built for Deepgram's voice agents, called through its Think API (Early Access).

pass^5
12.8%
pass@1
35.3%
TTFT
285ms
Cost/hr
N/A

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Alibaba

#24

Alibaba's open-weights Qwen3.6 mixture-of-experts model with 3B active parameters, thinking off.

pass^5
12.2%
pass@1
39.9%
TTFT
310ms
Cost/hr
$0.032

Mistral Small 4

Mistral AI

#25

Mistral AI's open-weights Mistral Small 4 (119B), reasoning off.

pass^5
11.1%
pass@1
38.5%
TTFT
827ms
Cost/hr
$0.227

PhoneLLM Alpha 1

Pipecat

#26

Pipecat's open-weights phone-agent LLM: a full fine-tune of NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B (3.5B active parameters, 256K context).

pass^5
10.0%
pass@1
19.1%
TTFT
394ms
Cost/hr
$0.095

Llama 4 Scout

Meta

#27

Meta's open-weights Llama 4 Scout, mixture of experts with 17B active parameters.

pass^5
7.8%
pass@1
23.0%
TTFT
544ms
Cost/hr
$0.093

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA

#28

NVIDIA's open-weights Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B with reasoning off, the base model of PhoneLLM Alpha 1.

pass^5
7.8%
pass@1
22.0%
TTFT
223ms
Cost/hr
$0.084

Qwen3.5 9B

Alibaba

#29

Alibaba's small dense open-weights Qwen3.5 model, thinking off.

pass^5
7.2%
pass@1
24.5%
TTFT
410ms
Cost/hr
$0.100